[Movie]Apollo 18

RSS
Movie total pnts rank Rank 3,908in 5,314 titlesTotal -1 / Deviation 46.86
Movie rank of 2012 Rank 137in 222 titles
Statics of evaluation and Ranking
Reviews' statics
Post review by myself
Poll
Information about this title

Warren Christie Lloyd Owen Ryan Robbins
Japan Released:2012/04/14(Sat)
Official sites
1. http://apollo18.jp/ (Translation)
2,74633
Recently views
2001000110
  Limit by opinioin
Search in this page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post your review to English version, please click here.
2013/03/07 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 42404 Host:42435 Browser: 9931
SF horror covered with the skin of the recording film.
In a word, this work is like this.

The story starts from the place where the recorded image of Apollo 18 is discovered after narration told the circumstances of the end of the Apollo program.

At first, three people (Nate, John, Ben) who showed a margin such as listening to the voice of a family discovered the body of a Soviet astronaut who freely moves the stone collected after finishing work on the moon ,
The mysterious creature that invades the inside of the space suit and attacks the nate, the nate which causes abnormality in the spirit, the face of three people who changed like a different person from the time of leaving the earth,
In the work itself, elements of the SF horror which made the moon stone (mysterious creature) the leading role are outstandingly, and the composition which roughness of the image and connection of the recording film also complements the mystery creatures and the madness of Nate It was.

Evaluation is "Good".

2012/04/23 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 10195 Host:10288 Browser: 13175
[good point]
Blur Witch Project of NASA version What is the idea of 〓〓〓〓〓reating interesting movies?

[Bad point]
A boring movie rarely seen in history.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Anyway, it is a movie that only boredom is good. A boring movie as if you worry about how you can make such a boring movie. As a professional reviewer thinks how to evaluate this work and see the Rottentomato site,
Dull, forgetable, (Darling, forgotten)
Boredom, (boring)
Startlingly long time to rev up (It takes a phenomenal long time to rise)
Mercilessly dull movie (unforgiving boring movie)
Zero-intensity space bore (zero boredom of stimulation)
Even critics like movies that can only describe boredom, such as.
Evaluation is the worst.

2012/04/18 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 31188 Host:30920 Browser: 7454
It was interesting.
Work using a momentary such as "paranormal activity".
Feeling "REC" plus "object X from planet". I thought that it was a good combination.
Although I was able to watch till the last at the cinema, I could watch it to the end, but surprises may not be surprising to those who have seen para normal activity, REC, Blair Witch project anyway.
The order of evaluation is paranormal activity> REC = Apollo 18> REC 2 〓〓〓Blair Witch Project.
I wonder if the paranormal activity that produced a surprise with a fixed camera with a low budget is missing from the front.
Because the story is solid, now this work and REC are spectacular and may be seen without getting tired.
If you like this work, Danny Boyle 's 127 hours are recommended besides the above - mentioned works.
By the way, on April 18th I went to see the campaign which entrance fee of 1000 yen to 18 of Apollo 18 was doing it was able to see cheaper than usual.
(Although I was aiming at it from the beginning) I want you to do these campaigns more and more for the revival of the movie industry recently that the voice of the movie theater leaves a bit of trouble.




↑Top