[Comics]Kakko Kawaii Sengen!
|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Jigoku no Misawa
|Japan Released:2010/01/04(Mon) JUMP SQUARE / End:2014/03/04 |
1. http://jumpsq.shueisha.co.jp/rensai/kakkokawaii/ (Translation)
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2015/02/11 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by mmmmm022 (Skip) Provider: 45932 Host:45760 Browser: 10334
It was good until 1-2 volumes. It was detailed,
It was rather funny that the neta that imitated a manga, the congregation 's meeting, and not the famous Uzakara route were rather interesting.
I am afraid of death of characters such as wallets or wife right away, 3 volumes and beyond is overdone. It is dirty as it is chattering. It is completely different from 1.2 volumes which had a lot of fine playfulness. I'm reading Richard Gere and something here.
I want you to think about improvement of handmade beyond degree, reconsideration of the contents of neta about real people, and the necessity of characters to die soon as gag cartoon.
But there are also some fun stuff in the story. Please read it.
2015/01/14 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ななみね (Skip) Provider: 2652 Host:2713 Browser: 9629
Pattern has personality
Basically it has low painting power
I can not read it
I do not really understand the character
Cool and not cute as well
Make it a pocahn rather than irritating
Everything except the personality of the picture has reached the level of professional ... Ika girl is also amazed
Ika girl is drawing a picture at the professional level and understanding because there is no place to be stressful as it reads but this is going to make people more irritated on poor picture ... I think that it is worthwhile as a work I will
I think that people who like this are pretty good things
2014/01/30 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by マオのパパ (Skip) Provider: 22865 Host:23049 Browser: 5870
I will read it, but while I'm reading Mr. Misawa 's manga, it becomes "..." after reading.
This is definitely different from other common "manga". Whether it is good or bad is a different problem, if you think that these kinds of style are manga, the extent of the skirts of the manga great country can be known.
The good part of this manga is aiming for stimulation to the emotions "Uzasa" and "Ira Tsuku."
In other authors it is something like "ball which is decided to be low in the out courses" which does not target first.
"Misawa = 1 pictures" is understood by browsing his website "Famous Quotes by Female".
It is fun to imagine the front and back of that one picture, and it is "not interesting" even if the author is a story set up with this character with this picture.
It is the same as not having an interesting entertainer if it does not move, and it is probably not somewhat a problem that it can not be fun with the second frame of the third frame of movement (only when there is a story) as it does not exist quite often.
Look at the front cover and read "Ira!" And read "Mu!
I think that there was no such style in the history of Japanese long comics.
Generally speaking, reading comics is exciting, exciting and excited, tears with Gusun, crying with Orolon Orolon should have been a side effect. But this comic has no such side effects.
I hurt the nerve ... or in reality society I want to refrain the most I want a person I want to avoid avoiding because it is in this cartoon so bad finish w
People who can see empathy and empathy by looking at this manga are pretty awful people w wow about that much w
But when I do it through one book, it makes me feel as if I showed something I dislike for a long time.
There is also interesting story if it is hoax. But the next is boring ... the next is not addictive ... after all it is a translation that will be "why did you buy such a cartoon?"
For those who would rather "make a woman ~" one thing planned things ... is the real intention.
After all it is a moment that both Uza and Iraki are tolerable, so you can endure it, it will be funny.
Perhaps it is a stubbornness of being personally unique, but it is an interesting picture of a large system that is not sticking to unusually stuck eyes. Although they can laugh for a moment's "bodily knowledge" lines, they want to kick when it gets cohesive. Such a strange manga.
Although it can be said to be a manga that has never existed, it is not a masterpiece free work but "odd work" stops. But, "Misawa of hell" I love you w
2012/04/03 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by soka (Skip) Provider: 21970 Host:21977 Browser: 1957(Mobile)
There was no collaboration with the poor god who is out of place, I did not see it.
Style is a gag cartoon ...
Sorry ... I can not follow too much.
2012/02/14 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by mosukuwa (Skip) Provider: 20089 Host:20180 Browser: 7541
I love a picture of "Misawa of Hell" and I often laughed to see it, but I thought that the form of cartoons would not fit.
It is not interesting at all. I personally distinguish between characters, but I thought that the style that expresses usability in that one picture is all of Misawa.
Even if obviously strange guy appeared, it was only a "do not care".
2011/12/09 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ジャンプ大好き (Skip) Provider: 28183 Host:28217 Browser: 3430(Mobile)
Good point Senpai Successor's story and wife's story are amusing and funny.
Bad point There are many unknown times.
The characters are the same except that the characters are hair as you are saying.
Background is too white and full of tingling feeling.
In addition to this, when SQ series signed colored paper gifts, it is omission like every time. (Dog just drawn with a single line?)
Gag comic series serialized with General Review Jump SQ.
There are occasional times with laughter, but the majority are many times.
Even if there are funny gags because the picture is too crowded it is a shame disappointing comic that does not have much laugh.
Then I can not convince honest animation.
I think that it would be better to do other works if it is about animating it.
I want to make the evaluation "worst", but as expected it is not in line with "Iji mania", "Posei", so "very bad"
2011/09/08 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by KAMIKAZE (Skip) Provider: 23134 Host:23231 Browser: 5345
Basically it is "Ira Tsuku" style, but it is conveyed that it is daring to make it dare, so even if it is so, there is no kind of disgust.
Because the page is short, it is suitable for reading with sense of relaxation.
Because the characters and the physique are all the same except for hair styles except for hair styles, it is difficult for someone to understand.
In addition, there is little change in facial expression of the person.
I feel that it is difficult to understand gags and contents, even if there are these.
Basically, this manga seems to be a work that makes the thing "rip off" thrilled.
But, that part also understands that it makes it crapy, and as it is, the part of "thinking and making it" is transmitted.
If you say this manga drawing with baseball pitcher, for the catcher who assembled the battery,
"I throw the ball I want to throw! You sit down, if responsibility is hit home runs in the first ball I will take responsibility!"
It is like a "reliable" pitcher with my own idea of 〓〓〓〓〓ascinating.
That does not mean to throw a rigid fastball in a blatant way, but a feeling such as a pitcher who feels to hit the opponent's devilishment with a ball of change and strikes a plaque is transmitted from a manga too.
I think that these parts are not bad, but since the characters that appear are all of the same face shape and the same physique, because there is not much change in the expressions of the characters and things that can not be distinguished except by the hairstyle,
It is still painful that the important parts such as who they are and what everyone wants to do is difficult to understand,
For that reason, the part that is becoming "hard to understand" (part-manager's story that puts posters inside the company that sleeps with the section chief, etc) can not be denied personally ...
I think that it is a "well-thought-out" manga, but as a matter of fact I have felt the "hard to understand" part more strongly than that,
I am sorry but I make the evaluation "bad".
2011/07/15 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by $ライト$ (Skip) Provider: 16514 Host:16692 Browser: 3447(Mobile)
Manga just to get irritated.
2011/04/04 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by サザ (Skip) Provider: 15848 Host:15871 Browser: 3458(Mobile)
A manga of doubt why serialization is possible.
Even though it is a gag comic, the gag is boring, it is still being read and irritated. For even something something saddley is the bottom of drawing. I can not find a good place.
Evaluation is the worst.
Aside from that, the support illustration for the victims who are on SQ's HP is the worst. I can not help to say that it is omission.
2011/03/20 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by バナナと猿 (Skip) Provider: 21970 Host:22005 Browser: 2051(Mobile)
The picture is a bit terrible, but the content is fun and it's nice to read
2010/11/15 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 絶対的禁止 (Skip) Provider: 21846 Host:21953 Browser: 1969(Mobile)
Although the picture is lower than the date of gag manga sunrise or close at hand at the same level, if it laughs at others, it is a work that can make it smile as it is. However, I can not laugh at Johnny Depp's similar material. I understand that story.
2010/11/14 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by なおおき (Skip) Provider: 14364 Host:14290 Browser: 9673
It's a gag comic so you can divide the main character to be cool and cute, but I could not think either ... (sweat)
Tema is not impossible even in Bussakawa .... (sweat)
2010/11/14 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by セルミン (Skip) Provider: 3196 Host:3180 Browser: 9224
I think the tempo of each episode is good.
〓〓〓The picture is dirty
〓〓〓Everyone's face is the same face
〓〓〓Individuality and charm are not seen in characters & do not know what to do
〓〓〓Gag is not fun at all
>> For example, when thinking that a feather went suddenly on the back of a man of a visual system, it became a form of a hand or I do not know the meaning as to whether the answer to the question "who leaked the bedwater?
Although it is a work that is talked about somewhat, I did not like it as myself.
I'm a surreal gag comic depends on things but this is not a category I like ...
I could not accept a picture as a bonus.
It is doubt why it was animated ...
Although it is bad for the person I like, the evaluation is "worst".
2010/07/28 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by イエガー (Skip) Provider: 6963 Host:6940 Browser: 7384
Often I do not understand the meaning.
Pictures are not good (almost every character is the same).
Although it is a gag cartoon, I can not laugh.
Personally, most of the contents are not interesting,
There are things that I do not understand.
I feel like a work I do not know what I want to do.
Because the picture looks the same, I want a little more ingenuity.
Because I think that it is a unique original style,
I'd like you to make more work by making more work.
2010/07/18 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by TCC (Skip) Provider: 23664 Host:23728 Browser: 11293
Well Square is also a certain garden balloon manga (I can not laugh much recently.) Because it reads for the purpose I will naturally see this .........
Although I am taking a form to post multiple talks in a jump in January,
The number of pages is small, the tempo is good, so you can read it casually at that point.
First of all, it is that gags can not laugh at all. Although it seems to be nonsense type in classification, it is said that it is said that seniors who were young Americ-like young people are cool, for example, whether appearing characters, number of people is large, thought reasonable to Moe is cool Nevertheless, I talked about concealing it as I noticed that the pants would fall. I say that we are weak,
"I wish I had returned to my house separately from my juniors by attaching some reasons." I could not help putting in.
The story of a certain young man who did not enter without unraveling the mystery,
I would imagine without confessing to trial that it copied Takeshi Kusanagi imitating him and practicing such a situation. (Bitter smile) That,
When trying to ascertain the surrounding reactions at the time of employment, it was strange after deciding to continue NEIT life for another half year, but it is not consistent (bitter smile)
Or rather, it was "It was useless". (Bitter smile)
One grandfather actually talked about what he thought of,
Although it seems to be a parody of a certain famous fairy tale, it is said that there is no fun in a flat board,
"You do not have to parody and do not try to make you laugh."
Was not it.
Even the picture, such a high drawing power is not essential for gag cartoons
(If there is of course there is nothing I have done)
There is no neck and characteristic of the person whose eyes are not far away,
It is rather low in the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, like just letting the characters squeeze the gentle feeling that they cast a cold gag.
I still managed to hand over 500 steps and still managed to overlook it,
It is useless that you never read that "pure laughter" has caught up. There is no momentum and punch line is weak, so the power to smile is not honest.
In short, it is probably "a new type jump type hetuma gag cartoon", but unfortunately this is also a read skip candidate.
Well it is hard to say that the level of the series of square of the other is high,
I guess it would have been unnoticed if there was no girl balloon aim aimed at. Needless to say the evaluation. Only "worst" would be appropriate.
2010/07/15 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 後衛 (Skip) Provider: 8090 Host:8171 Browser: 7856
It is interesting. It is fun to watch.
There are times when I do not understand the meaning.
Personally I think that it is very interesting, but sorry it is sometimes I do not understand the meaning ...
Also, because there is no picture (painting power), is not it?
It's funny, but sometimes I get frustrated when there is a time when I'm thinking "Why are you again !?"
Evaluation is very bad ....