[Comics]Haman in Axis
|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Monthly Gundam Ace
Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.
|Japan Released:2003/05/26(Mon) Monthly Gundam Ace / End:2006/05/26 |
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2011/08/13 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 墨汁一滴 (Skip) Provider: 21970 Host:21942 Browser: 2413(Mobile)
I will recommend it to people all over the country like Haman. Anyhow cute Haman says a little natural Shaa, I keep thinking about as much as she loves her Haman But I'm thin I'm a little big tits Natalie Lieutenant, Colonel Enzo who sometimes receives sorry muscle stupid treatment , Haman's sister Celana in the new character, last daughter is overly dutifully, and such a daughter is interested in Char as it is not himself, so even a murderous intention is passed even though such a murderous intention is passed through such a Char, such a parents stupid dad Maharaja. Kahn . It is craftsmen's perception that everyone develops a gag that is unique and individual girls do not get tired of it.
Just being regrettable is that I ended it because I wanted to continue more.
2007/08/08 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ユニバース (Skip) Provider: 1942 Host:1857 Browser: 3875
It was an interesting gag comic normally. Even now it is a little disappointing that the series has ended. "kind of!"
It was laughed considerably with characteristic speech turning such as the word "Nani Ya ~".
The picture is also refreshing and it is easy to read. There was only one drawback .... It is this work
Because it is a cartoon parody "Portrait of a young comet", it is hard to have fun if you do not read it
However, this "portrait of a young comet" is so boring that he is surprised.
2006/10/21 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by メビウス (Skip) Provider: 16857 Host:16826 Browser: 3875
The honest Gundam is not very detailed, but the stage of this work is a story between First and Z.
However, although this work is not so detailed, it is not a work that you can not enjoy it because you do not understand the translation.
It is a parody of "a portrait of a young comet" which was a serial work of the same Gundam Ace.
The author is Yukihiro Inoue 's super - stolen "Dorhilla" which remains in a bad meaning in that jump history. It is correct in a sense to have a bad feeling at this point. In the first serial series "Dollhillah", the picture changes to the extent that a stranger that is too incomprehensible, almost a different person draws from the middle of the story (the author seems to escape in the middle of the series, the assistant drew), anyway It was a terrible and terrible work, after that, it caused a plagiarism riot by reading and dried Shueisha, and managed to get a job at Kadokawa by a friend of Professor Hirofumi Tamaru, and this will be a serial series of this work.
I am a fan of Tamaru's work, but when I first read this work,
"Dr. Tamaru's work? But the picture is somewhat different ..." When I looked at the writers Inoue Okihiro on the net,
I knew that it was a problematic writer of "with tag" as mentioned above, and I agree that it is possible.
This person is not reflecting at all what caused the plagiarism. That much work is that Tamaru work.
As there seems to be a time when Mr. Tamaru assisted me as a friend from high school days, I guess whether you are doing pakuri official recognition or are they coauthors or not, Mr. Tamaru is doing a ghost writer I did it.
Then it should be credited with "Original: Hirofumi Tamaru", that there is no such thing as "pakuri in person recognition" probably. I think that stealing his skill in the Ashi era can be evaluated in a sense as a cartoonist, but I think that I should not make it as my own work.
Although it is not possible to deny the possibility that Mr. Tamaru may have thought of name, neta maybe ....
Then you should include credit. As a common sense problem. Mr. Tamaru who forgives plagiarism as "because he is a friend" has some problems, but from that, does Professor Inoue have no pride as a professional cartoonist? I wonder if I do not draw such a work if I have it ...
I think that it is a person who is well done as a parody gag of Gundam. Without allegations of plagiarism.
I think that you should not make a good evaluation when considering Mr. Inoue's stance as a cartoonist.
A manga artist who was a former assistant of someone often receives a certain influence of that "master", but I think that it is not quite so easy to do so far.
The work itself is by no means bad. If the author is "Hirofumi Tamaru", I wanted to give "highest!"
However, the story is totally different when it becomes 'plagiarism authorized by himself.' Needless to say evaluation.
2006/05/30 Normal comment [Original Japanese review]
by 羽幌炭鉱 (Skip) Provider: 28154 Host:27915 Browser: 4487
Finally this work also ended serialization ....
It is a (good and bad) juel parody work of the main part, and there is nothing even less than that, and even though Gundam A readers feel that there is a person who is aware of the existence of this work There was.
What is it, the last round impresses a broken feel somewhere, "Why is this this?"
It was like touch.
Because there was a considerable serialization period, it is not amusing for even a small number of pages of this work to be sufficiently personalized, but how is it?
2005/12/24 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 貞吉7 (Skip) Provider: 47133 Host:47311 Browser: 6885
It seems like it ended when I say "gag" at Gundam Ace,
The existence of Toni Takei is too big. In Uruagagu it will receive as much useless impression as possible ... It may be appropriate to see it with a sense of chopsticking as if the Haboro coal mine said that it is sensuously a four-frame manga Is it like it?
2005/11/07 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 羽幌炭鉱 (Skip) Provider: 23100 Host:23128 Browser: 4487
In a good sense "a poison or a medicine" It is a chopsticking work.
It is a parody work of serialized at Gundam Ace [portrait of a young comet], a so-called "Moe Haman" and lieutenant Natalie is a gag manga that causes a fuss in Axis.
This work, written by the author of the work [Dorhilla] that became a legend by the Weekly Shonen Jump, I do not know how it is due to the difference in environment with Shueisha, but I do a better job than Shueisha era It is an impression. Well, while I was working in Shueisha era, I was ....
Sometimes, there are times when it is more interesting than the main story, but well there is a work of small items. It would be better if you do not want high quality during high quality.
However, it is a work that is not bad at all, and it can be said only that it has a good taste as a breathtaking work just for a chopstick break.