[JP movie]Walking with The Dog
G(For all ages)
|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Hiroyuki Nagashima Argo Pictures
Naoki Tanaka Cocorico
Yumi Yoshimura Puffy
Zin Katagiri Rahmens
This description has the part which was created by referencing Wikipedia, so the licence of GFDL is applied to this description.
1. http://www.argopictures.jp/inuto/ (Translation)
|Promotion video (1)|
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2016/03/05 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by TCC (Skip) Provider: 29292 Host:29168 Browser: 5213
Coco Rico, who served as a voice actor of the main character even in a certain B class panic movie that was broadcasted on terrestrial broadcasting the other day, was Mr. Naoki Tanaka, but this time he was a role of freeters who did not give way to Udatsu.
It seems that it was the place where I said whispering why I got lost to home,
I guess it was also that I had not been forsaken by luck as I met a dumping dog (named Tamura). It was also characteristic that some famous places such as Mr. Hisashi Shimada and Mr. Susumu Terashima were appointed to Choi supportor such as the scene that he escaped from police officers who were suspicious behind the scenes and the scene where customers were gathering like a drinking shop was. However, aside from the former,
I guess there were some lame scenes or somewhat wasted scenes.
Through encounter with Tamura, the growth of the hero who found the way to live was drawn as it was, but on the other hand her. My sister (her thing about the hero) It was not drawn too much darker than necessary, such as feud with a sister who was tired of taking care of herself as well as being badly treated, and her mother's intractable disease, The setting is also conspicuous, I wonder if the punch which appealed as a human drama was insufficient.
Although Tamura and other dogs were also cute as usual, it would have been better to have pushed such dogs' cuteness further in front of the title, but it was "general in general." in short.
Mr. Tanaka 's acting was not mediocrity, and it was not bad, but maybe I saw some points "I should draw more interestingly this way like this" too. Evaluation is "normal".