|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Hiroshi Hashimoto Nakatani Mayumi
Hayato Ichihara Akiyoshi Nakao Keita Saito Teppei Koike Kimura Ryou
Satomi Ishihara Reina Asami Emi Suzuki
Takatoshi Kaneko Sayaka Yamaguchi Waka Inoue
|Japan Released:2004/07/26(Mon) 21:00-21:54 Fuji Television Network, Inc. / End:2004/09/21|
1. http://www.fujitv.co.jp/waterboys2/index2.html (Translation)
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2010/08/14 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ノントン (Skip) Provider: 13552 Host:13338 Browser: 5999
Synchro performance. The five-stage tower is amazing.
It is too much content. I was watching the development which is too promising.
The character is not attractive. It was a painful five people looking at something differently from the personality and laughable 5 people of the previous work. The main character is too bad, human relations are not refreshing, it feels like being wasted.
I do not like the heroine much. The cold impression compared with the previous work.
The way to tighten the last was the worst. It is a story of a youth drama of decades ago. Compared to being the best last gathered in the previous episode, 'I will not forget' or 'I became a little grown-up' is too cold.
A story that can also be said as a tragedy of a series thing that has overwhelmingly deteriorated in all aspects. Both the story, the actor and the heroine are inferior to the previous work.
We should have finished with '1' all the time. As I was looking forward to it I was disappointed.
2008/09/25 Best(+3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 里緒 (Skip) Provider: 13163 Host:13037 Browser: 8396
I love collecting friends from time to time,
I also like quite a lot of relationship with brass band this time vvV
After all, when I'm doing it many times, I think that the expansion is the same,
I personally like the horse road so I am the best because it is vvV
2008/03/09 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 石鯉 (Skip) Provider: 31011 Host:31181 Browser: 8090
It was a work that fell a lot.
The story was getting weaker and the level of the gag was also falling.
Because I could not even impressed the final round ...
More than anything, the sync scene was bad.
The shape was broken and the difficulty of the technique was lower than before.
Well, it was nice to have seriousness as usual.
2007/08/12 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by シャル (Skip) Provider: 1407 Host:1250 Browser: 5598
Although the quality is inferior to the previous work, it is a work that I enjoyed. Like the previous work, the process of collecting friends little by little to deepen friendship and to complete synchro performance was impressive.
But, by the way, there was absolutely no previous impact. Would it be that the second disinfective elements become stronger when you put the series again after all?
Evaluation is made "good".
2007/08/07 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 樹梨葉 (Skip) Provider: 32756 Host:32737 Browser: 2864(Mobile)
Evaluation is bad. I am rebroadcasting now, so I will evaluate it even now. I have not seen the movie, but since the previous work was good, I certainly feel unsatisfactory. I feel that the setting of a girl student is too bad. No matter how much the former girls' high school and the number of people and power are also above, there are only characters that only uncomfortable feeling. The heels of the previous work and the adults who blocked it were pretty. However, because it sees somehow, it is normal.
2006/12/23 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 佐々成政 (Skip) Provider: 24296 Host:24206 Browser: 5234
It is this work that made the proportion of romance elements higher than in the movie version and the previous work.
Personally I feel the most favorable among 3 works.
Suigaki Emi of the supporting role is very cute.
Is Satomi Ishihara of the heroine also a stubborn character that it was a stubborn actor? It felt good performance without fail.
2006/08/24 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by アインシュタイン (Skip) Provider: 11396 Host:11621 Browser: 6287
Something is doing this by rerunning around 4 o'clock right now. I am watching it.
I do not think it 's special but I'm seeing something.
Although evaluation here is pretty bad, I do not think that it is bad so far.
I can also sympathize with the hero's swimmer. I want to support you.
I also say that in my mind I do not like to swim so hard that I was struggling when I was small.
To be honest, I do not like Ishihara Satomi so much, but I am also looking for love elements.
It is certainly a one-pattern, but because it is fun personally, with "good".
2006/08/17 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by Y・I (Skip) Provider: 1598 Host:1650 Browser: 4184
Clearly I did not feel more interesting than the previous work. The impression of deployment was strong, and there was almost no brand newness. Cast is also inferior to the previous work and movie version. It may not be easy to make a sequel readily as it is popular as others say. I will surely compare it with my previous work. Evaluation is "very bad". Because movie version and 1 were very good it seems extra.
2006/07/13 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 綾波・億彦・マジカルシュガー (Skip) Provider: 12151 Host:12308 Browser: 3875
This is saying that my mother is interesting.
To be honest, the story is with the previous work.
This is already boring.
I was impressed by seeing the movie version and 2 is tight.
Evaluation is "worst".
2006/02/05 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by まつ (Skip) Provider: 36407 Host:36422 Browser: 3846
I was expecting only the previous work and the movie version were fun ...
Unfortunately it was not funny.
I saw this and thought that I do not need a sequel anymore
2006/01/25 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by rangame (Skip) Provider: 41922 Host:41919 Browser: 4184
It was not a feeling that it could not be seen whether it was the fact that it is said to be the first look of the series or only to see this.
I can not deny the feeling that female students' bad harassment or unreasonableness of Odaka's change is a bit overkill.
I usually think that Ishihara Satomi's bossoboso talking and acting watching it is a real actress? (I'm sorry by the fans), but when I am working it is the original part of the character 's original part Well, it says like this I thought that it was going to be big and I was not bothered a lot and the members of the synchro section were quite unique and there were parts that I was looking at and interesting.
I think that evaluation is better than normal.
2005/12/27 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 無線機 (Skip) Provider: 21233 Host:21119 Browser: 4487
Unlike the previous work, I feel a lot of stuff.
I was expecting a little but I already gave up on my first talk.
Eventually I saw it until the end, but the idea did not change.
Deployment is bad with a feeling similar to the previous work.
2005/08/15 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by FIRE (Skip) Provider: 39002 Host:38985 Browser: 4184
As the series goes forward, it is obvious that the quality of the work has declined. I was disappointed to see this after watching a movie.
Although I was a bit uneasy at the time I saw the first drama work, this work made me wonderfully at that anxiety.
Notha further deteriorates the use of previous works, people who do not care very much with casting, the school life, which is one of the tastes of this drama, can not be played well.
I can not bear to see the quality of masterpieces falling more and more any longer. I want you to end it.
2005/03/27 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by エスパー (Skip) Provider: 5974 Host:6051 Browser: 4184
When this was produced and announced, I thought "Why do not you make a sequel to the movie version? Do you want Andastan?"
Although the previous work was also able to be fucked like a betrayal of a fan of a movie version, the fucking rate has further increased for this work.
I was too bad for acting and withered. That youthfulness of the movie version could not be reproduced. But phew....
At that time I often saw it on CM, every time I saw that CM, my anger came out well. I am not going to drama on condition.
2005/03/27 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by うら (Skip) Provider: 51192 Host:51185 Browser: 5234
It was not interesting at all.
Originally I did not like this series, but 1 was still better.
I have never seen a movie, but I heard that it is Ryosaku and probably this is the worst of the series.
You can not do anything from acting in the first place. The performers were not able to watch it in a useless manner.
Also, the story is incomprehensible, what you want to say, what is interesting, why popularity came out.
I would like you to stop doing this series any more.
2005/02/22 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 向井大輔 (Skip) Provider: 35453 Host:35471 Browser: 4184
"You have come out, Detaso, you were a naked one!"
As I want to cry, I am sticking to the eyes to wander about by a sea bread. I did not like it at this time. There really is not a daddy.
It was somewhat impossible to choose a woman who was stupid and had a feety look like a child at the land section. Running scene does not have body double. When I saw the start of a woman without instantaneous power, my mother, a consultant at the land base, adviser at the basketball club laughed a lot.
The writer who has sometimes been called "high speed noble child" is also fine. Does that speed speed up like that? I do not think it's part of the track division.
2005/02/22 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by C.Q. (Skip) Provider: 10337 Host:10090 Browser: 5978
I have not seen 1 of the drama, but this time I saw the movie on TV as it was like a talk later, so I saw it with that flow, but this time it was boring although the movie was good. Or was it because the movie was that director, was it interesting, is it? It seems there was popularity when seeing rebroadcasts at the New Year this year. That rebroadcast was pain only for me.
2005/02/21 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 三面 (Skip) Provider: 7364 Host:7132 Browser: 4184
Third work like it was attached (including movies).
I saw it properly only in the final sync scene.
You certainly will not do this year, right?
2005/02/21 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by エムプティー (Skip) Provider: 9462 Host:9759 Browser: 4925
Far away from movies, it is inferior to everything compared to 1.
The story did not change so much from 1, and I made it high school like something meaningless woman rib. It is like a composition somewhere seen. People who know it is like "I am a man!"
In the end, people around the world oppose the syncro performances in the same way as 1.
The head of 1 was meaningful and opposed, but I felt only because it is just barbarous.
The performance of the hero team is also terrible. Or, some characters have already been covered by character setting.
I did not perform very well at the last buttribe, but since the character setting was good, the character was standing.
And heroin ... I'm not going to say Satomi Ishihara badly, but I am completely defeated by Suzuki Emi.
It was a bit different and I could not see it.
After ... ... the worst part. Why is there no bar ?! A side supporting role is not standing at all. Compared with last time.
It is like feeling that the performance of Kazuka Inoue, even if gravure acts again, is such a thing.
Personally I wonder what Kazuka Inoue is ... ....