[Drama]Asakiyumemishi Yaoya Oshichi Ibun

Drama total pnts rank Rank 2,187in 2,609 titlesTotal -2 / Deviation 47.09
Drama rank of 2013 Rank 89in 125 titles
Statics of evaluation and Ranking
Reviews' statics
Post review by myself
Information about this title

Jams Miki
Toshiyuki Watanabe
Atsuko Maeda
Yuta Hiraoka
Masatoshi Nakamura
Keiko Takeshita
Ryosei Tayama
Japan Released:2013/09/19(Thu) 20:00-20:43 NHK / End:2013/11/21
Official sites
1. http://www.nhk.or.jp/jidaigeki/asaki/ (Translation)
Recently views
  Limit by opinioin
Search in this page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post your review to English version, please click here.
2013/11/25 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 36209 Host:36373 Browser: 9950
At a press conference before the aired, James Miki left a comment on "Maeda Atsuko to 2nd Sawaguchi Yasuko".

Surely the newcomer Sawaguchi who starred in the morning drama "Mio Tsukushi" he worked on has greatly stepped up as an actress ....
However, Sawaguchi was poor at the beginning as well as acting improving over half a year 26 weeks, while this work is one third in the period, only one fifth if drama scale so〓〓〓

Indeed, Maeda Atsuko who has experienced so much in contemporary dramas also challenges the era drama for the first time.
The heroine seven who plays actively speaks loudly in a loud voice and is poorly appealing and is also stubbornly Kichisaburo.
It would be nice if you just follow along with a script at the very least Emotional transfer is difficult if the two people 's familiarity is done only with the first episode of injury and the second episode "I lived at the same Terakoya for a year".
It seems that it should have prepared an event for at least 3 or 4 stories.
Nakamura Masatoshi who seems to be able to keep it in the middle stage Because it was more interesting than the couple quarrel with the bunch that the fact that Kiyubei of the father who acted in the concubine had been exposed to the concubine was contrary, contrary to the uselessness of the main two It stands out.

It was such a condition that the magisterial office in the final stage for the authority, trying to make the seventh to be the scapegoat of the firebomb also the hero who looked at love dazzling and disturbed the investigation seemed to be half mindedly self-made It was.
Furthermore, the seventh age has been lowered from the beginning, is this a measure to mislead the childishness of acting?
Also at the end of the year it will be around 20 years old to emphasize the tragic heroine in a form that is executed while throwing a stone at the person suffering from the fire is the pressure of the office or something, Has it been changed to a sympathy for being a child?

It was a work that the badness of the cooperation between the script writer and the leading actress was conspicuous. Evaluation is "very bad" from "bad".