|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Takei Touka Toko Machida Yukiko Horiguchi
Kadokawa Shoten Publishing Co.,Ltd.
Kadokawa sneaker bunko
This description has the part which was created by referencing Wikipedia, so the licence of GFDL is applied to this description.
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2014/01/31 Bad(-1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ふるふるP (Skip) Provider: 6090 Host:6335 Browser: 5143
Lucky Star's Ranube version.
Works dealing with the content that people familiar with cheerleads are killed one by one. (Lucky Star Murder Case)
You can enjoy lucky star's extraordinary life.
Nori is the same as a cartoon and it is easy to enter.
The conclusion that I am stupid about the reader.
It is impossible for him to deal with the murder case in the first place.
It is an impression of the Lucky Star murder case.
It is thin and easy to read, so even people who are not good at books can read crispy content.
It will be a story, but it is making it so that it can only be said that the conclusion is as expected.
As a mystery novel, I could not really enjoy it because there are things that are too fine.
2011/10/22 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by オモプラッタ (Skip) Provider: 15333 Host:15377 Browser: 6358
Because I read only the first murder case, I evaluate it.
Strictly speaking, you can learn about one base in the genre called Ranube.
There is no dust when listing one by one.
Good wisdom, it is a level that admits that it is a thing that made it possible to put such things as a product.
First of all, it may be impossible to deal with the theme of murder case by the original work of everyday things that 〓〓〓I might have piggybacked on Haruhi's murder case.
Even if it is a form in which characters of main characters are involved as victims.
Next, the writing ability of the person in charge of the novelization is too much.
Because it is a play plan of Moe 4 frame original work, the content of tricks, puzzles, and seediness is too much, although it is already in this case I close my eyes, but as I go forward with reading, it is not to give out the warmth of the original view of the original
(It is not necessary to do such a thing from the beginning in the homicide)
It is easy to understand that the writer is composed of such a cheap sentence because it is an author who can write only things of the composition of elementary school students.
I used emoticons and font emphasis or change in the text, but rather spurred even more thinness.
And above all, the advertisement of a different work by the author has been done many times in the text and it is not gloomy over there.
Editors who made OK with such content do not know exactly what they are thinking.
2009/08/23 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 薄荷 (Skip) Provider: 10770 Host:11007 Browser: 4184
It is an evaluation of the murder case because it reads only the murder case.
It is an ingenuity for expressing the part expressed in anime (because he is definitely not conscious of manga) or is it a funny way to express it using AA for such expressions as AA I thought.
However, since it often seems to express such a thing on the Internet by that method, it may just be wonderful considering the purchasing layer.
The main part is also terrible, but the lucky channel part is also terrible.
It goes without saying that it is the worst.
I have never read another novel version, so it may be more expensive but .. I do not feel like wanting to read because the murder case is this way.
2009/07/08 Very Bad(-2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 広本跡 (Skip) Provider: 18061 Host:18322 Browser: 5292
It is an impression of "murder case".
"Fairytales great war" "online" "loose Days" is unseen, but you will not see anything (laugh).
...... That? I can not think of it (laugh).
The abbreviated name of Kyo Anni at the beginning and the feeling that "You talked about this kind of thing for the time beings" is very disgusting about the nose. As for the contents, explanation will be explained with Akira-sama's dialogue "What is this farce?"
Although it is boring to tell the contents honestly, if you like this work, I think that there is no sense of incongruity separately. Please read it without permission.
2009/07/04 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by GAGAGA (Skip) Provider: 12831 Host:12902 Browser: 8839
I have it all, but I thought that "loose it is good" is the most interesting.
Mr. Takei Mr. Takui's guy is saying that he did not have a feeling of being aware of in "Lucky Star" and he does not feel it is very interesting.
"It's nice to see you" is progressing in the first person's view from the viewpoint of Kagami and Hiyori, so I feel like I've been feeling quite a bit like "Lucky Star" and I think it's good.
2009/04/18 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by りィ仔 (Skip) Provider: 24033 Host:24044 Browser: 4487
I am glad that there are someone who can see the contents of the novel 〓〓〓
In addition, I think that it is good to have the date of release written.
To have someone who can not see the contents of the novel.
I want more detailed content !!!
I think that it is very good.
Well ... there are bad points though.
2009/02/23 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by シャル (Skip) Provider: 45917 Host:45778 Browser: 3876
As a frank impression, the world view and setting were completely different for each roll, and I received the impression that there is a difference in the fun of the story.
Although the manga version feels like "subject matter of everyday", the novel version seemed to have a strong sense of "non-everyday" appearance as well as setting.
The story is an impression that you can enjoy things that match your taste, but a story that is not so stuck is not impressed, I received a feeling of being dull.
The character's characterization seems to be the same as a cartoon, and although there are relatively few pages, there is an impression that it can be read easily.
Also, I thought that other work 's parody material was more than the cartoon version.
However, I was sorry that the illustrations were completely absent in the course of the story.
The charm of this work is the unique story development which does not exist in the cartoon version.I think that it can enjoy the view of the world.
I thought that such "freshness" has become an attraction of this work.
However, since the setting is greatly different for each volume, I thought that it would be uninteresting unless I could keep up with that setting.
Although interesting scenes can be read well at a tempo, there are also places to remember boredom when reading, and it is the impression that there is a heading in fun.
Although there are some dissatisfaction points, I thought that there is an impression that I can enjoy as it is, so I make the evaluation "good".
2008/07/14 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by CTU (Skip) Provider: 37093 Host:36959 Browser: 8901
Lucky Star Murder Case "Good" Lucky Star Online "Very Good"
It was like that.
The voice and expression of the character has also been transmitted by looking at the sentences, and there are "rasiness" also in the main part in some places
The murder case was a slightly conservative impression, but there was a feeling that online is doing much better
Illustrations such as Miwa Kagami's cover were also nice.
2008/07/04 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by クックック〜 (Skip) Provider: 54329 Host:54425 Browser: 9190
Lucky Star is still interesting even in the novel version. I think that the author knows this work well. The story of the "murder case" is an entirely new attempt that did not appear in any series so far, but I thought that it was wonderful that it exquisitely matched this "Lucky Star" work. However, since elements of Moe were transmitted only by letters, it might be a bit unsatisfactory to attach "highest"?
Evaluation is "very good".