[Anime]Ishida to Asakura

  • Moral
  • Made me think
  • Shocked
RSS
Other media: Comics:ISHIDA to ASAKURA
Anime total pnts rank Rank 5,776in 6,386 titlesTotal -6 / Deviation 46.45
Anime rank of 2013 Rank 237in 262 titles
Statics of evaluation and Ranking
Reviews' statics
Post review by myself
Voice/Actor1.00(Good)3
Music-0.33(Normal)3
Story-1.33(Bad)3
Graphic-1.67(Very bad)3
Character/Setting-2.00(Very bad)3
Moral67%2/3
Made me think67%2/3
Shocked67%2/3
Scareful33%1/3
Enjoyed33%1/3
Funny33%1/3
Sexy0%0/3
Cute0%0/3
Hot heart0%0/3
Brave0%0/3
Shed tears0%0/3
Sad0%0/3
Beautiful0%0/3
Romantic0%0/3
Friendship0%0/3
Cool0%0/3
Learned something0%0/3
Impressed0%0/3
Interesting0%0/3
Poll
Information about this title

Shonengahosha
Ken-ichi Yamashita
Hiroshi Yamamoto
DAX Production Inc.
Nakamoto nobuhisa
Shuta Moreshima
Toru Sakurai
Sumi Shimamoto
Go Shinomiya
This description has the part which was created by referencing Wikipedia, so the licence of GFDL is applied to this description.
Japan Released:2013/01/06(Sun) 22:27-22:29 Tokyo Metropolitan Television Broadcasting Corp. TV / End:2013/03/24
Official sites
1. http://ch.nicovideo.jp/ishidatoasakura (Translation)
Official Twitter
1. http://twitter.com/ishidatoasakura
Music movie except for OP/ED or unknown one (1)
ドキドキドク- 玲里(Rayli) short ver. TVアニメ「石田とあさくら」主題歌 [Fan reg.]
[See more]
5,82655
Recently views
6211022012
  Limit by opinioin
Search in this page

The below reviews are translated automatically from Japanese ones. To post your review to English version, please click here.
2014/08/29 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 16070 Host:16253 Browser: 3521(Mobile)
[Evaluation points]
I really want to answer "no", but I think that the point that such anime animation circulated in the world can be evaluated.
[problem]
The vast majority of the material is down, but this is frighteningly boring. Only anger and amazement come back.
Characters are also unattractive. It feels like I did a punishment on a note. TRIGGER's "Inferno Cop" character seems to be several hundred million times better. The character of "Chuanry" was also bad, but at least it was better than this work.
[Overall rating]
This animation work is made up of stuffiness, characters, and all parts are fucking. Personally it is the worst short animation in line with "ass dog". There is no room for doubt. If you are watching this, you can watch other animation works, or you better follow other things. Even if you borrowed it with rental it could be returned in a few minutes. I do not mean to kill time. You should never see this animation. Even if you see it, only regret and guilt will remain.

2013/04/30 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 13318 Host:13450 Browser: 5378
[good point]
Downhill only though it is funny!
Yamada is too irresponsible, but that is also interesting

[Bad point]
It would be better to shorten the conversation between .OP, Ishida and Asakura

[Comprehensive evaluation]
The authorship has become a problem in Trepak, I think that I enjoyed it regardless of that. I burst out laughing in front of the screen.

I want to maximize the evaluation, but since there are things of the original author, I lowered it one by one and it is "very good"

2013/03/25 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 35983 Host:35764 Browser: 1967(Mobile)
I will evaluate it because the airing is over.
[good point]
There are things that it resists because the main part is composed almost entirely of bottomy material.In particular, the teacher 's elephant neta and the boobs that appeared even in the last round are well incorporated into the story. It is wonderful where the skillfulness of incorporation has changed the way you show the story with laughter wearing a surreal feeling somewhere even at the Ishida's girls 'turnouts and the characters' appearance times with many bursty laughs And more than anything more than anything during about a minute there was a lot of funny parts and frankly funny parts of the story. Especially, the unexpected character of the character was impressive (such as the breast star of the last round etc.) OP Although the song is short, it is a song which remains in the ear, and I personally thought that the lyrics were suitable for this work.

[Bad point]
At the beginning of the first one is too one pattern Ashida always in Ashida "Ishida, there is a favor, do not do the flower shop together!" Because I talk about everything from the subject saying, I feel mannelli And why Yamada It came out from the way and was attacked, I became concerned that scenes which suddenly leave are continued every time.

[Comprehensive evaluation]
Tres of the original author.The work which I want to watch without worrying about the image of the allegation of suspicion of pakuri Although it is somewhat one pattern.Although each gag is interesting and it makes me laugh at the unexpectedness of the characters, I want to say "good."

2013/01/22 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 23122 Host:23164 Browser: 5345
[good point]
None
[Bad point]
I am irritated how to speak English
Besides the neta only neta and other than that is boring
[Comprehensive evaluation]
It was the time I saw the story for a moment and I understood that this was a bit weak, but I endured it with 3 episodes but it is already the limit .... The 5-minute animation of this term is really different from the winning point ... This is a great departure. Yes.
Evaluation is the worst.

2013/01/18 Worst(-3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by (Skip) Provider: 24026 Host:24034 Browser: 5345
"It is an animation of" Trepak is ballet, a comic that became a problem as much as there was actually an electric convex in the picture report company, and it was obviously ceased due to the problem. "
It seems like a lie, but it is a true story. Obviously you decided to animate from the beginning, did not it?

Aside from that. Even such a work may be a good animation if there is a struggle of the staff.
There are instances in the world that 〓〓〓〓〓S, the author is human beings and the writing power is also Ranobu, while in animation it became Ryosaku.
So how about this work?

The structure of a channel of a certain movie site and the official website can only be thought of as handy before broadcasting.
A smiley movie description of a video is not corrected in spite of the number of misspellings passed.

Even if it is broadcasted, it is a painting that changes from one episode to the other except for the mouth.
From the second episode onwards, the first half is used at the beginning of the last time.
I do not know where to laugh, I wonder if I misunderstood the word Sur, the content I do not understand.
Characters that do not feel attractive or erotic at all. Is it okay to laugh anomalous teeth as a character called Yamada?
Asakura who is one of the main character, he is extraordinarily homosexual and heterosexual, but if you open your mouth you say only "boobs", and how to talk is troublesome, a bad head is he I do not understand the cause.
It makes me feel like I should laugh at Yamada anyway from the middle. And Ishida whose model is regarded as an author (although the author himself denies it) is more beautiful if she gets a lot more than shelter ...?

... Even if it is told that honest impression is put on, it is really troubling.

Is it something that is not a 30-minute frame but a 2-minute animation? Although that 2 minutes is painful though.
(To be precise, because there is a use of rotation at the beginning and OP, real animation itself is about one minute)
I saw this animation with almost no expression for that 2 minutes.

Evaluation is definitely worst.
If you give up a nice thing, the voice actors are also mixed with veterans and play the character very well.
Moreover, OP is also wonderful song about as good as this animation.
As a result, the voice actor and the singer are getting sorry.

I think how to write so much, but even with a certain smile movie, I was distributing this,
There is a phenomenon that the number of playback increases as much as 1 talk in 1 hour increments, and we recorded 100,000 playbacks.
However, after that it got tangled with 15000 in 2 talks, and more people were divided by 10,000 after that.
I watched this kind of outright praying for a long time.

Postscript: Official twitter is the worst. It's time to put other anime in the hashtag of the tweet, saying that believer of that animation was vandalized!
Isaasa clearly said that because it is notoriously low-profile, it did not become a flame or flutter, but I wonder if it was wrong to say it was wrong.




↑Top