|Statics of evaluation and Ranking|
|Information about this title|
Yosida Tatuo Tatsunoko Productions
Kuri Ippei Takeo Matsuura Hirohisa Sota Hiroyuki Toriumi
Mahito Tsujimura RYUSUKE SHIOMI Maki Kyosuke Nobuo Tanaka Iemasa Kayumi Masashi Amemori Takato Masayasu Saka Osamu Tatsuyuki Jinnai Takuzo Kamiyama TamioOoki Mikio Terashima Shibata Hidekatsu
|Japan Released:1971/04/03(Sat) / End:1971/09/25|
- ▼Sorted by:Newness
2015/12/05 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 魔神モデラ (Skip) Provider: 14836 Host:14853 Browser: 5357
Although I was able to listen to the first episode only on youtube (of course, on the official channel of Tatsunoko), a sentence appearing at the beginning expresses everything I want to say about this story.
Even from the point of view, I was depicting that "Do not devote your eyes as it is commonplace in war" even the "tragedy of war".
The first episode was the content of the Pearl Harbor attack. At that time, how to draw the "life" at the US military base was realistic.
Indeed it is actually seen that even the first episode "was not biased towards Japan and the United States" was an expression.
"The tight schedule of planning to draw" based on "the old Japanese soldier of the historical donor 's attention to the detailed depiction" and "that appointed an illustrator who is not an animator", which is a drawback of this work, It is "moving" with camera work.
There are plenty of places to say that even if you are watching it is "not anime".
Actually he saw this work in real time was actually only the 26 th story, the last round. However, with this, I realized that the Japanese have recovered from the tragedy brought about by the war so far. At that time it was religious that the Japanese who became peaceful after the war became a story because the fear was stronger than the warfare at the time.
This work was a very valuable experience. Tatsunoko takes in a new method leading to the "Science Ninja Corps Gatchaman" and human resources leading to later generations such as "Tomonobu Hikawa" and Koji Mori etc. are produced, and furthermore the drawback of this work is a new method It is supposed to lead to "Magic Legend Acrobatic". The coalesced bank of 'Acrobantic' is a thing that might have never been born without this work. And if it did not exist, no masterpiece painter called Masami Otaku was born.
If this opportunity arises with this work, please also see "Nissay animation special 24 eyes".
2011/12/17 Very Good(+2 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 在原健太郎 (Skip) Provider: 8623 Host:8584 Browser: 9929
A documentary animated drama based on the Pacific War aired in 1971. The historical facts from Pearl Harbor attacks to the Potsdam Declaration and commanders on the battlefield show the time of commander 's important "decision".
This work is an opening ceremony and is an animated work of a documentary "Pacific War" which is frequently caught during the end of war memorial period. Each commander, including the Japanese navy's commander Yamamoto, and the tactics and determination in the game situation are drama It is drawn in a way. Major battleships of the Japanese Army.Fighter and submarine attack scenes and strategy tactics by strategy.The details of the tactics etc. are drama style and the circumstances to the declaration of war by the attack of Pearl Harbor and `Midway 'Coral Sea' 'Leyte Oki' Individual duties and battle scenes of each unit such as each naval battle and falcon, such as Kamikaze Squadron, and their respective commanders and soldiers suffering, glimpse the hearty of determination and the like faithfully Where you are is very good. It is the charm of this work that shows inside of the mind participating in the battle of those who stood in the battlefield which can not be reproduced by the document program. As you know, in the Pacific War Japan was a disadvantage to allied forces in every aspect, so I think that I really suffered how to open a way and how to win in such a situation. Moreover, the Japanese at that time with Yamato Damashi wanted with the feeling not to give up on grinding despite how many enemies were disadvantageous, so how their decisions were carried out under this harsh circumstances It is good to show how much hesitated and suffering to make it resolve. To that it is the life of each soldier and the destiny of Japan, so it's natural that everything is taking its decision. Naturally, I am also suffering, but the real thrill is showing the circumstances of the human pattern that dewed each intention and idea until the decision.
This work reproduces battle scenes etc. which are not in the documentary in a real fashion, faithfully depicts the appearance of war and the human drama in it, and thinks that it is still a work that still works, so the evaluation is [very good ]. It seems that he was accused of showing militarism and war praise at the time at the time because it reproduced too faithfully, but I think that it is the mission to correctly inform the historical facts, and 66 years since the end of the war Because memories are sometimes forgotten in the war, therefore, even though this work can not be accepted at that time, I think that it is a necessary work which should not be erased now.
2009/09/20 Normal(+0 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ジャンボーグQ (Skip) Provider: 5391 Host:5324 Browser: 9573
Although there are places like war praise, I think that I am drawing a historical fight faithfully, not to hate hatred, especially to other countries.
Although it is a work of 1971, the picture is quite beautiful. Tempered stones. In fact, I think that battleships and fighter planes and others are drawing well.
I think there are sights in the strategy and what.
Depending on the number of stories, it is hard to see because the age is disjointed. From 20 talks to Japan's inferiority - It connects with the Potsdam Declaration, but in the first half the episode (battle) scene does not proceed.
Too many broadcasting ban words. Far from being a remake, if this work does not add hands, it seems that broadcasting is severe even in CS? (It seems that it was sweat)
Why is the final round being a giant ?? "Determined by Kawakami's director" (sweat).
I was surprised that this is "Masked Rider" counterprogram. I think the theme is a difficult work (in every sense). But because I do not dislike it is "normal".
2009/01/04 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by ガーリックトースト73% (Skip) Provider: 9144 Host:9140 Browser: 6342
It can be said that it is an animation drawn from a neutral point of view. Perhaps it is difficult to make exactly the same thing in today's Japanese society.
It is therefore worthwhile and the person who engaged in the production is the war generation, so extra reality comes out.
In modern textbooks, "Japan was defeated of war" is written only, and no knowledge can be obtained.
This animation points to the important part of "Why did I lose, what should I make a lesson," and handed it over to us.
Personally, it is dangerous that the previous war is "bad" and that the people are completely self-contained midway as a lesson.
That is why it is important how we acted and what we saw and what we felt.
Evaluation is "good". Although it did not show the collapse of drawing with polite making while playing,
On the other hand, it is regrettable that the use of the cell picture was conspicuous.
2008/10/24 Best(+3 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by レッドフォード (Skip) Provider: 21016 Host:20958 Browser: 4696
I was a 6-year-old child at the time, but my family and I watched it in real time.
It was easy to understand even at a child's age, and I felt the misery and stupidity of war also in my childhood.
Even if it sees it with the present eyes, it can evaluate as a work pursuing reality by incorporating the live-action movie-like element such as reference from the live-action movie in the 50's to the 70's and so on.
Mechanics such as those of the dramatic style, real fighters and battleships are also wonderful, it is a work I would like the current adult to see again.
2008/04/11 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by 下田の里 (Skip) Provider: 29220 Host:29081 Browser: 3876
It is an animation with the theme of war that covered everything from the opening of the Pacific War to the end of war (and until the decision of Tetsuharu Kawakami, unfortunately I have not seen this time), if you watch it with the filter of the Showa 40 's then very high quality I think that it is a work of.
It is not a short-circuited war praise (the beautification of the Great East Asia War), but it is a style in which the "suffering of the man in the field" and "the anguish of the commander" seeps out, drawing a warfare from the soldier's point of view in each episode I had a favorable feeling.
However, if you look at the current viewpoints such as materials and visuals, the details are coarse and it seems that the director seems to be old - fashioned as "It can not be helped".
As the work itself, "digest of the Pacific war by animation" is very good quality, I think that it can be recommended to all.
Evaluation is "very good" close to imperfect "good".
2008/04/11 Good(+1 pnt) [Original Japanese review]
by アニオヤジ (Skip) Provider: 28568 Host:28483 Browser: 4184
It is a generation that I was watching in real time. I was watching it with my family because it was a living time.
I learned more than the discipline of military personnel, strategy, war history etc. I learned at school.
Although it is an entertainment method called animation, it can be called a fine documentary work.
Meanwhile, I should have seen it several times including rebroadcasting, but I do not remember feeling such as "absurdity of war, misery".
"War praise" was directed by leftist wing forces in a directive excluding human dirt.
I think that it is worth seeing as a tool to recognize that "the Pacific War has advanced with this trend".
After seeing the work, of course, there is a need to go one step further.